More NewsData Quality Concern with SWIFT Cover Payments Rule

Data Quality Concern with SWIFT Cover Payments Rule

The majority (60%) of compliance and payments industry executives believe the new SWIFT cover payments rule, MT202 COV, raised the standard of sanctions compliance, but many also credit it with increased workloads and costs as well as mounting concerns over duplicate alerts and data quality, according to surveys conducted by Dow Jones.

Roughly half (49%) of survey respondents experienced an increase in workload following the introduction of MT202 COV while 36% said their costs of compliance increased. The rising costs come as 51% of respondents expect their budgets to be stagnant over the next year.

“Greater transparency in payment origination led to a significant increase in the number of payments subject to sanctions regimes,” said Rupert de Ruig, managing director of risk and compliance at Dow Jones. “Without a corresponding budget increase, compliance departments must employ more efficient processes and technologies to minimise the impact without increasing risk.”

When respondents were asked to rank their level of concern regarding key issues when screening wire transfer messages, their concern rose across the board after MT202 COV took effect. Data quality saw the biggest jump as 41% were ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ concerned about this issue before MT202 COV, but 62% said the same after the rule took effect.

Concern about a high number of duplicate alerts also jumped significantly as 47% of respondents identified this as an issue after MT202 COV took effect, compared to 30% before the rule was implemented.

“Issues with screening effectiveness will take centre stage if companies are not using sanctions lists that are completely accurate and formatted to produce a single alert,” said de Ruig. “With record fines for sanctions breaches hitting the headlines and a significant number institutions carrying out expensive remediation behind the scenes, executives should consider limiting exposure by carrying out a proactive evaluation of the effectiveness of their current tools.”

Dow Jones conducted two surveys to measure the impact of MT202 COV, which took effect in November 2009. The first survey, conducted from 31 August 2009 to 9 September 2009, received 52 responses and the second survey, conducted from 23 March 2010 to 6 April 2010, received 53 responses.

Related Articles

Preparing for GDPR? Here’s four things to consider

More News Preparing for GDPR? Here’s four things to consider

2m Elliott Wiseman
Cash flow in focus for investors

Cash Management Cash flow in focus for investors

3m Conor Deegan
Treasury TV: Karen Pugsley, Domino's Pizza Group

More News Treasury TV: Karen Pugsley, Domino's Pizza Group

3m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

Compliance Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

3m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Tim de Knegt, The Port of Rotterdam

10 Minutes With The Treasury Treasury TV: Tim de Knegt, The Port of Rotterdam

4m Victoria Beckett
Banks are selling clients short with short dated cash deposit U-turns

Banking Banks are selling clients short with short dated cash deposit U-turns

4m Victoria Beckett
What does sterling’s Brexit boost mean for UK manufacturers?

More News What does sterling’s Brexit boost mean for UK manufacturers?

4m Tasja Botha
FX for corporates: 5 best practices for treasurers

Economy FX for corporates: 5 best practices for treasurers

4m Mateo Graziosi