Thailand’s Credit Fundamentals ‘Can Weather Crisis’
Despite the country’s recent unrest and its negative impact on economic growth Thailand’s sovereign credit profile remains consistent with its Baa1 rating level and stable outlook, said Moody’s Investors Service.
The credit ratings agency (CRA) expects Thailand’s political situation to stabilise by the second half of 2014, and assumes that elections for a new government will be completed and a government formed, likely by July as the political schedule is currently unfolding.
“We also expect the on-going protests to remain concentrated in certain areas in Bangkok and do not foresee significant physical disruptions to vital economic sectors, such as manufacturing or tourism,” said Steffen Dyck, a Moody’s assistant vice president and analyst.
Dyck was speaking on the release of a new credit focus on the government of Thailand. The report presents a detailed discussion of Moody’s baseline scenario for 2014, the links it sees between the political crisis and Thailand’s creditworthiness, as well as the country’s credit fundamentals.
While Thailand’s government bond rating remains unchanged, the report notes that the political crisis is weighing on its growth performance in 2014.
“Political uncertainty negatively affects private consumption and investment, and the tourism sector may suffer as well. However, Thai government finances continue to show a considerable degree of decoupling from political events,” adds Dyck.
The report notes that Thailand’s credit strengths mitigate the negative impact. The favourable character of the government’s debt structure is a key credit strength in this regard.
Other strengths include prudent monetary, macroeconomic and debt management, sustained external strength despite erosion of the post-Asian financial crisis current account surplus, a relatively strong growth outlook and an overall healthy banking system.
Thailand’s fundamentals and existing buffers compare favourably to other Moody’s-rated sovereigns that have recently experienced revolutions, or are undergoing political crisis.
However, the examples of Egypt, Tunisia and Bahrain also highlight the potential speed and magnitude of sovereign rating downgrades if political conflicts intensify towards, or result in, a violent overthrow of the government.
Factors that could trigger a negative rating action include: