RiskOperational RiskM&A Activity Spurs Demand for Transactional Risk Insurance

M&A Activity Spurs Demand for Transactional Risk Insurance

Demand for transactional risk insurance grew by 41% globally in 2012, as firms increasingly turned to the insurance market to protect large deals and cross-border acquisitions or sales according to the risk advisory and insurance broking group Marsh.

A report issued by Marsh’s private equity and mergers and acquisitions services (PEMA) practice, entitled
‘M&A Transactional Risk Solutions: 2012 Global Review’
, shows that the limits of insurance placed by Marsh in 2012, compared to 2011, by geography were: Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), US$2.2bn (US$1.7bn); Asia Pacific, US$423m (US$387m); and the Americas, US$1.4bn (US$768m).

The most pronounced increase in policy limits for transactional risk insurance is in North America, up 86% during 2012. Marsh suggests that this upward trend is being driven by an increased usage of transactional risk insurance on deals in excess of US$100m by clients operating in the region.

“Overseas buyers seeking acquisitions in North America are increasingly cautious about entering the market, given the uncertainties surrounding economic recovery and the enhanced emphasis on regulation,” said Lorraine Lloyd-Thomas, a senior vice president (SVP) in Marsh’s PEMA practice and head of the UK transactional risk team.

“Conversely, many North American clients are approaching deals in EMEA and Asia Pacific with similar trepidation. As a result, these corporate buyers are leveraging transactional risk insurance solutions to mitigate risk and provide the comfort required to proceed with their transactions.”

The report also notes the growing popularity of warranty and indemnity (W&I) insurance in the global infrastructure sector, ranging from simplistic deals relating to wind farms to complex assets such as those owned by utilities and regulated by government agencies.

“Demand for W&I insurance is growing significantly in the global infrastructure investment community,” said Lloyd-Thomas. “It enables infrastructure funds to exit their investments with minimal warranty exposures, or make their deals more attractive to potential bidders, hopefully resulting in a higher price.

“There is a great deal of competition among insurers for these risks and Marsh has structured a number of programmes in excess of US$300m limits of insurance in the last year.”

Related Articles

The digital fortress: fortifying your treasury

Operational Risk The digital fortress: fortifying your treasury

5m Martin Bellin
De-risking trade finance operations: A transitional approach

Bank Relationships De-risking trade finance operations: A transitional approach

5m Jacco de Jong
2017's most read: Open API: unlocking innovative new services in banking

Automation 2017's most read: Open API: unlocking innovative new services in banking

6m Lu Zurawski
BNP Paribas Cash Management University day 2: cyber attacks, predictive analytics and investing

Banking BNP Paribas Cash Management University day 2: cyber attacks, predictive analytics and investing

7m Victoria Beckett
Can you afford not to be ethical?

Compliance Can you afford not to be ethical?

10m Philippa Foster Back
A ‘wait and see’ approach won’t work: US businesses must prepare for GDPR

Bank Relationships A ‘wait and see’ approach won’t work: US businesses must prepare for GDPR

10m Patrick Lastennet
Ethnic diversity in top companies improves

Consumer/Retail Ethnic diversity in top companies improves

10m Graham Buck
Brexit confusion over MiFID II compliance: Let the preparations begin…

Compliance Brexit confusion over MiFID II compliance: Let the preparations begin…

10m Matthew Bryars