FSA Replacement Bodies Reveal Plans and Risk Outlooks: 1 April also Date for new Libor Rules
It’s not a joke and the date of its demise is coincidental insists the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA), which will be replaced by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) on 1 April 2013. The outgoing UK regulatory body has revealed the business plan and risk outlook for the new bodies, while also affirming that new Libor rules and regulations coming in after the manipulation scandal will also start on Monday 1 April.
The new Libor regime will have benchmark administrators to corroborate submissions and monitor for suspicious activity. Data submitters will be subject to new systems and controls and a conflict of interest policy, while both groups will be subject to an Approved Persons Regime. The new rules start on 1 April and follow the recommendations of the Wheatley Review, which outlined a 10-point reform plan for Libor, and other benchmarks, last September, following the Libor manipulation scandal, which came to fruition last summer and adversely impacted corporate treasurers relying on interbank base rates to provide the ‘floor’ for derivatives hedges, right through to consumer repayment loans.
The Euribor index is exempt for the time-being, although this will soon be covered too, as will other commonly used financial benchmarks in compliance with the wishes of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) expressed earlier this year, and the already stated wishes of the FSA (see their policy statement and more details here).
Interestingly, Martin Wheatley, the man who made the UK recommendations to clean up the Libor setting mechanism is also the chief executive officer (CEO) designate of the new FCA regulatory body in the UK, which is the largest of the post-FSA bodies coming into being. It will focus on consumer protection and supervise 26,000 firms across all financial industry sectors from 1 April and the prudential standards of approximately 23,000 firms not regulated by the PRA. The latter body will focus on a small number of larger, systemically important institutions, while the Financial Policy Committee (FPC), which is also controlled by the Bank of England (BoE), will focus on systemic risks to the entire financial system under Britain’s new post-FSA regulatory regime, examining leverage ratios, countercyclical capital buffers, and the like.
The implementation of the Wheatley recommendations are certainly needed, with the Freddie Mac lawsuit against the banks responsible for Libor manipulation only the latest manifestation of its on-going impact.
Commenting on the new regulatory regime being introduced into the UK on Monday, Wheatley said: “Firms need to ensure that they are putting the consumer and the integrity of markets at the heart of their business models and strategies. This includes making cultural changes which promote good conduct; establishing oversight around the design and innovation of products and services; and ensuring they are transparent in their dealings.”
Risk Outlook and Plans
The out-going FSA regulatory body has outlined the new business plans and risks for its successor bodies, with the FCA in particular expected to take a much more risk-based approach to supervision in future, recognising the diversity of the firms and markets that it regulates. The new regulator will be much more proactive, acting earlier and more decisively than the failed FSA did, which has been held culpable as one of the contributing factors towards the lax regulatory regime that allowed the UK banking sector to get so bloated before the 2008 financial crisis. It is to be hoped lending, customer services and fair fees to corporate as well as retail banking customers, and those seeking small-scale investment products, will be much improved under the FCA. For larger multinationals and corporate treasurers, which tend to deal with the bigger cross-border global banks, the PRA’s interpretation of its new powers for systemically important institutions will likely be much more interesting. A longer risk overview and focus on market integrity are expected to be watchwords for both new bodies, and for the FPC, which should ensure that credit default swaps (CDS) positions and leveraging do not get so out of control again. The FCA will enforce the rules with inspections and enforcement powers that allow it to take action against anyone who abuses the system.
The business plan sets out how these risks will be managed in the first year and how the FCA will use its human and technological monitoring resources to effectively to meet its objectives, which are:
The FSA undertook the risk outlook to identify the key risks in the financial services industry before its demise. This analysis has shaped the FCA’s priorities for its first year of operation, starting from 1 April onwards, with market integrity set as its guiding primary principle. This is eminently sensible after the reputational battering that banks have got from corporate treasurers and the general public since the Libor scandal, the mis-selling of interest rate hedging products to small businesses’ in the UK, and indeed the onset of the 2008 financial crisis.
The key areas of focus for the FCA during its inaugural year include:
The risk outlook underpins the business plan. The main specific risks identified for the coming year are: inadequate product design and opaque distribution channels; payment and product technologies that are too central to the business model and not closely monitored; and a poor understanding of risk and return, which combined with the search for yield or income in a low-interest rate environment – whether from treasurers or consumers – can lead to more risk-taking than is appropriate. So-called innovative, complex or risky funding strategies or structures, which lack oversight and imperil market integrity, are also being targeted.
“Our first year as a new regulator will be an exciting and challenging time but one for which we are well prepared,” said FCA CEO designate Wheatley. “We are introducing new approaches to the way we do much of our work, becoming much more proactive. A risk for all regulators is becoming bound to conventional thinking. That is why the new regulator will be much more transparent, so we can learn from our mistakes. There is no room for the poor behaviour of the past. We will take action early and decisively when we see evidence of poor practices.
“We cannot succeed wholly in isolation. To achieve our aims, we need the cooperation of the firms we regulate and the vigilance of their customers. A strong, successful financial services industry is essential.”
A financial services sector that doesn’t fall apart and drag down the rest of the economy with it is the ultimate aim of the new UK regulatory regime, of course, but as ever the fear must be that the new rules and structures address the crisis just past, rather than protecting the sector against future, as yet unforeseen, threats. As Donald Rumsfeld, ex-US Defence Secretary, might have said it’s the ‘unknown unknowns’ – the black swans, call them what you will – that you’ve got to worry about.