Insights & InterviewsBanker bonus proposals – should you be worried?

Banker bonus proposals – should you be worried?

78% of people believe that the existing banking bonus culture is “unhealthy” and public faith in the system languishes at an all-time low. But are the FCA’s new proposals the best way to tackle the problem?

78% of people believe that the existing banking bonus culture is “unhealthy” and public faith in the system languishes at an all-time low. But are the FCA’s new proposals the best way to tackle the problem? Oliver Parry, Corporate Governance Adviser to the Institute of Directors, has his doubts.

The proposals which were outlined this week in a joint Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)/Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) consultation on new remuneration rules in banking, allow bonuses to be clawed back up to 10 years after they are paid out if senior managers come under investigation at a later date. This, says Parry, seems “extreme.”

Clawback is not a crude regulatory instrument like the EU bonus cap.” He says. “But in suggesting tough rules by international comparison, UK regulators must be very careful to balance the stability of the system against the need for vibrant banks that oil the wheels of the economy.”

This doesn’t mean, though, that nothing should be done about the issue, according to Parry. Executive pay across the UK’s biggest companies, not just in banking, can raise eyebrows – especially as pay quadrupled from 2002 to 2012 without any obvious correlation to company performance. “While exceptional levels of pay may be justified in exceptional circumstances for exceptional individuals, the median level of executive pay has ratcheted up to a level that is at times hard to justify,” says Parry. “This is unhelpful to the reputation and legitimacy of UK businesses.

Whilst pay in the private sector is ultimately in the hands of the firms themselves, Parry hints that the government should get more involved in the shareholder-company engagement process to make it harder for greedy directors to fatten their wallets at their company’s expense. The public, too, has a role to play in defining norms and pressuring companies to keep pay appropriate, he says. But, ultimately it comes down to shareholders.

Indeed, we have called for remuneration to be designed to promote the long-term success of the company and for performance-related elements to be stretching and rigorously applied,” he said. “To quote Bischoff, ‘Remuneration and incentives that encourage people to cut corners or prioritise short-term gains over the long-term interest of the company should be rejected.’”

 

 

Related Articles

Talking about trends in treasury recruitment

Insights & Interviews Talking about trends in treasury recruitment

1w GTNews
Using neuroscience to create business change: SAP Ariba Live - Day 3

Insights & Interviews Using neuroscience to create business change: SAP Ariba Live - Day 3

3m Victoria Beckett
"The architecture of financial markets has changed": Stefan Bielmeier, DZ Bank

Automation "The architecture of financial markets has changed": Stefan Bielmeier, DZ Bank

5m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Jill Harrison, Whitbread Plc

10 Minutes With The Treasury Treasury TV: Jill Harrison, Whitbread Plc

5m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

Compliance Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

5m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Building a case for an improved financial system with blockchain

10 Minutes With The Treasury Treasury TV: Building a case for an improved financial system with blockchain

5m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Tim de Knegt, The Port of Rotterdam

10 Minutes With The Treasury Treasury TV: Tim de Knegt, The Port of Rotterdam

5m Victoria Beckett
GTNews' 20th anniversary: The evolution of trade

Banking GTNews' 20th anniversary: The evolution of trade

6m GTNews