RegionsEEAIUA Calls for Clarity on Insurance Regulatory Regime

IUA Calls for Clarity on Insurance Regulatory Regime

The International Underwriting Association (IUA) is urging UK insurance regulators to state clearly the prime authority of company boards over individual responsibilities for complying with industry rules.

Responding to a consultation exercise on a new senior insurance managers regime, the London-based IUA called for “a strong overarching statement that individual duties remain subordinate to those exercised by a firm’s board.”

Under proposals from UK financial sector watchdog the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) senior executives, such as chief executive officers (CEOs), chief finance officers (CFOs) and chief risk officers (CROs), would be charged with demonstrating integrity, honesty and skill and dealing with regulators in an open and co-operative way.

“The new regime appears to be reasonable and proportionate,” said Chris Jones, the IUA’s director of market services. “It is particularly encouraging to see that a similar set up for the banking industry has not been directly transposed into insurance, and the different supervisory requirements of our industry have been acknowledged.

“As the main focus is on individual culpability, however, it is not entirely clear how this would complement collective board responsibility. These two elements could seem to be at variance and companies would therefore like to see a stark statement affirming the board’s supremacy.”

Elsewhere in its consultation response the IUA also requested further guidance on the type of roles that the PRA might designate as ‘key function holders’, in addition to named senior insurance managers.

“IUA members widely support the need to formally embed regular assessments and reviews for those people performing key responsibilities,” said Jones. “In order to ensure that these requirements remain proportionate and relevant it would be helpful if the PRA could be as clear and transparent as possible about its expectations of firms.”

The treatment of non-executive directors is not included in the current consultation but is expected to be considered in a separate process this year. The IUA wants this to be completed at the earliest opportunity, as it believes that continuing uncertainty may discourage good candidates from accepting roles.

Related Articles

“Destroy or democratise” – how Open Banking will impact connectivity

Banking “Destroy or democratise” – how Open Banking will impact connectivity

3m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

Compliance Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

3m Victoria Beckett
Money market reforms: Navigating LVNAV, CNAV and VNAV

EEA Money market reforms: Navigating LVNAV, CNAV and VNAV

4m Victoria Beckett
The Challenge of Building and Maintaining a Central Treasury Operation in a Decentralized Company

EEA The Challenge of Building and Maintaining a Central Treasury Operation in a Decentralized Company

4m BELLIN
The Treasury Challenge of a Post-Merger Integration

EEA The Treasury Challenge of a Post-Merger Integration

4m BELLIN
The Challenge of Integrating Worldwide Subsidiaries into one TMS

Baltics The Challenge of Integrating Worldwide Subsidiaries into one TMS

4m BELLIN
Q&A with BMG's treasury : BELLIN - We Love Treasury 2

EEA Q&A with BMG's treasury : BELLIN - We Love Treasury 2

4m BELLIN
PSD2: dull name, but seismic effect

Clearing & Settlement PSD2: dull name, but seismic effect

4m Alex Kwiatkowski