Industry SectorsFinancial ServicesAustralian banks urged to assess regulatory changes

Australian banks urged to assess regulatory changes

Some Australian banks should consider adjusting their business strategy in response to “significant regulatory changes”, according to Wolters Kluwer Financial Services.

Some Australian banks should consider adjusting their business strategy in response to “significant regulatory changes”, according to Wolters Kluwer Financial Services.

In a newly-published white paper entitled ‘Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: Impact on Financial Institutions in Australia.” the firm examines the changes included in the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB).

They include the requirement to meet heightened risk and regulatory capital calculation obligations, which may necessitate investing in new, sophisticated IT infrastructure. This will be costly and may force banks to completely re-assess their business plans, the white paper notes.

Wolters Kluwer notes that the FRTB is the latest revision of trading book capital rules by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) that aims to ultimately reduce global financial risk. It deals with what it considers to be weaknesses in the current design of the regulatory capital framework as it relates to the trading book by applying more rigorous qualification requirements for the trading and banking books, seeking changes in the constitution of both.

Under FRTB rules, banks will need to respond rapidly and accurately to regulators’ enquiries, whether scheduled or ad-hoc. Moreover, in order to optimise their capital under the new rules, they will need to identify all asset classes and trading desks that contribute to capital charge.

All affected portfolios will need to be analysed and optimised according to capital parameters. As such, underlying data must be consistent and IT infrastructure must be sophisticated enough to analyse large amounts of data, yet flexible and fast enough to extract required information for regulators at any time.

“The cost consideration may be the key factor in determining whether some market participants decide to completely overhaul their business strategy, concluding that the new rules are too onerous and compliance is too difficult and costly,” commented Soon Kit Tham, risk specialist at Wolters Kluwer Financial Services and report author.

“Much of what is being proposed in the FRTB could be implemented in 2017. Banks need to start planning and implementation as soon as possible, in order to allow for adequate testing time. Put simply, time is running out.”

Related Articles

“Banks must prepare for API unknowns”

Open Banking “Banks must prepare for API unknowns”

23h Michael McCaw
Denizen CEO: Borderless approach key to post-Brexit financial services

Banking Denizen CEO: Borderless approach key to post-Brexit financial services

23h David Beach
Open banking: the unfinished revolution

Banking Open banking: the unfinished revolution

3d Jo Howes
PSD2 is helping banks adapt to a more secure, customer-centric environment

Banking PSD2 is helping banks adapt to a more secure, customer-centric environment

6d Emilie Casteran
Scaling your payments with APIs

Open Banking Scaling your payments with APIs

2w Karthik Ravichander
Is Ripple a threat to SWIFT gpi's monopoly on cross-border payments?

Banking Is Ripple a threat to SWIFT gpi's monopoly on cross-border payments?

3w Victoria Beckett
Cashless economy puts financial inclusion at risk

Banking Risk Management Cashless economy puts financial inclusion at risk

4w Benjamin Anderson
Digitization and the role of the digital treasurer – part 1

Banking Digitization and the role of the digital treasurer – part 1

4w Victor Penna