TABB Group sounds warning on US corporate bond market
Traditional indicators of liquidity that indicate the market is thriving are over-optimistic, misleading and mask a developing crisis, argues TABB Group.
Traditional indicators of liquidity that indicate the market is thriving are over-optimistic, misleading and mask a developing crisis, argues TABB Group.
Traditional indicators misleadingly suggest that liquidity in the US corporate bond market is currently thriving, but even in the years preceding the 2008 financial crisis these measures were increasingly challenged, suggests TABB Group.
The New York and London-based international research and consulting firm says that traditional liquidity metrics – including volume traded, issuance, notional outstanding and bid/ask spreads – are “as narrow today as they were in pre-crisis years”.
More robust metrics are now needed, according to its report entitled ‘Bond Liquidity Metrics: Reading Between the Lines’, which notes that many regulatory bodies have publicly reinforced an optimistic outlook for the market based only on the traditional liquidity measures.
In the report, co-authors Anthony Perrotta, TABB partner, global head of research and consulting, and TABB analyst Colby Jenkins, leverage 2015 survey results from asset managers, dealers, and hedge funds to assess the landscape of the US bond market and the effectiveness of tools used by market participants to measure its liquidity.
“Dealer business models have shifted, leaving post-trade data and the established procedures for reporting unable to capture the evolving dynamic, which in turn has misled regulators and market participants relying on traditional trade data resources,” says Perrotta.
“As dealers step back from their role as dependable facilitators of liquidity and providers of pre-trade information, innovative liquidity measurement solutions may step in to fill the gap and become a key tool for investors seeking to navigate tomorrow’s corporate bond market.”
Among the survey findings analysed in the report:
“Although high-level statistics taken at face value suggest that the notion of a liquidity crisis affecting the marketplace is unfounded, a more in-depth analysis clearly tells a different story,” says Jenkins.
“Looking further into the data, we find that liquidity has decreased precipitously and the changing market structure is eroding the bond market’s status quo.”