RegionsEEAUK Treasury plans crackdown on tax avoidance

UK Treasury plans crackdown on tax avoidance

A consultation paper proposes large financial penalties for accountants, lawyers and consultants whose aggressive tax avoidance schemes are defeated in court.

Accountants, lawyers and advisory firms that devise tax avoidance schemes for businesses and individuals that are successfully challenged in court face substantial financial penalties under proposals from the UK Treasury.

In a just-published consultation paper, it proposes that the lost money is returned to the taxpayer through a fine of up to 100% of the tax avoided through schemes such as offshore tax havens. Accountants could face fines even in cases where the tax avoidance advice they provide isn’t actually illegal.

Last month, upon taking over as UK prime minister, Theresa May described tax as “the price we pay for living in a civilised society” and promised a crackdown on aggressive avoidance schemes.

“It doesn’t matter to me whether you’re Amazon, Google or Starbucks, you have a duty to put something back, you have a debt to fellow citizens and you have a responsibility to pay your taxes,” she said.

Under current UK rules tax avoiders risk incurring significant financial costs when HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) defeats them in court but that same risk does not extend to those who advised on, or facilitated, the avoidance scheme.

Opening a 12-week consultation period on the proposals, Jane Ellison, financial secretary to the UK Treasury, commented: “People who peddle tax avoidance schemes deny the country of vital tax revenue and this government is determined to make sure they pay. The vast majority of their schemes don’t work and can land their users in court facing large tax bills and other costs.”

The UK government has stressed that it is not targeting legitimate means of reducing tax bills, but wants to eliminate schemes that bend the rules to gain a tax advantage that Parliament never intended, an abuse estimated to result in lost tax revenues of nearly £3bn a year.

The Treasury proposals were welcomed by pressure group the Tax Justice Network, although it noted that the new rules would need to be enforced in the courts by HMRC. Its research director, Alex Cobham, said: “The proposal to go after enablers of schemes that have been successfully challenged will have no impact on this major area of tax losses, unless the government is finally willing to take on multinationals and the big four accountancy firms in court.”

Related Articles

“Destroy or democratise” – how Open Banking will impact connectivity

Banking “Destroy or democratise” – how Open Banking will impact connectivity

4m Victoria Beckett
Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

Compliance Treasury TV: Yeng Butler compares US and European MMF reforms

4m Victoria Beckett
Money market reforms: Navigating LVNAV, CNAV and VNAV

EEA Money market reforms: Navigating LVNAV, CNAV and VNAV

5m Victoria Beckett
The Challenge of Building and Maintaining a Central Treasury Operation in a Decentralized Company

EEA The Challenge of Building and Maintaining a Central Treasury Operation in a Decentralized Company

5m BELLIN
The Treasury Challenge of a Post-Merger Integration

EEA The Treasury Challenge of a Post-Merger Integration

5m BELLIN
The Challenge of Integrating Worldwide Subsidiaries into one TMS

Baltics The Challenge of Integrating Worldwide Subsidiaries into one TMS

5m BELLIN
Q&A with BMG's treasury : BELLIN - We Love Treasury 2

EEA Q&A with BMG's treasury : BELLIN - We Love Treasury 2

5m BELLIN
PSD2: dull name, but seismic effect

Clearing & Settlement PSD2: dull name, but seismic effect

5m Alex Kwiatkowski