Corporate TreasuryCentralisationLinde, Praxair abandon US$60bn merger

Linde, Praxair abandon US$60bn merger

The German industrial gases group has ended talks with its US peer on a potential union to establish a market leader.

German industrial gases group Linde has called off merger talks with US peer Praxair, which if successful promised to create a market leader with a value of more than US$60bn.

“While the strategic rationale of a merger has been principally confirmed, discussions about details, specifically about governance aspects, did not result in a mutual understanding,” Linde said in a statement. Praxair also confirmed in a one-sentence statement that discussions had been terminated.

While reports suggested that the talks were only at a “preliminary stage”, according to the Financial Times the two companies had been in negotiations for at least three months and that the structure and many key parts of a deal were already in place.

However, sources at the German group told the FT that an internal disagreement at Linde had led to negotiations being terminated and that Wolfgang Reitzle, chairman of Linde’s supervisory board and the architect of the deal, faced opposition from Georg Denoke, Linde’s chief financial officer (CFO) since 2006.

Thomas Wrigglesworth, analyst at Citi, suggested that meeting tough regulatory requirements was also a factor in the failure to reach a deal. “A failure of these businesses to integrate not only suggests that any bid premium will be removed from Linde’s share price but also implies, we judge, that any further consolidation in the industry is unachievable as the regulatory challenges are too great to surmount,” he wrote to clients.

The talks took place against a background of consolidation in the industrial gases industry, where slower economic growth has weakened demand in the manufacturing, metals and energy sectors.

Related Articles

What are treasury management services?

Centralisation Outsourcing What are treasury management services?

4w Jay Ashar
Factors to consider when centralising cash management

Cash Management Factors to consider when centralising cash management

4m Christian Bartsch
Centralisation versus decentralisation

Centralisation Centralisation versus decentralisation

11m Nash Riggins
Payments at a price: the true cost of in-house bank connectivity

In-house Bank/Reigonalisation Payments at a price: the true cost of in-house bank connectivity

1y Bob Stark
Treasuries must be 'both centralised and decentralised'

Career Moves Treasuries must be 'both centralised and decentralised'

2y Victoria Beckett
2017's most read: The future of cash management: the single multi-currency virtual account

Accounts Payable 2017's most read: The future of cash management: the single multi-currency virtual account

2y Matthew Fuellhart
A new era in digital banking: virtual account management

Cash Management A new era in digital banking: virtual account management

2y Matthew Fuellhart
10 minutes with the treasury: Malcolm Pape, Experian's EMEA CFO

10 Minutes With The Treasury 10 minutes with the treasury: Malcolm Pape, Experian's EMEA CFO

2y Victoria Beckett

Whitepapers & Resources

Transaction Banking Survey 2019

Transaction Banking Survey 2019

4m
TIS Sanction Screening Survey Report

Payments TIS Sanction Screening Survey Report

6m
Enhancing your strategic position: Digitalization in Treasury

Payments Enhancing your strategic position: Digitalization in Treasury

8m
Netting: An Immersive Guide to Global Reconciliation

Netting: An Immersive Guide to Global Reconciliation

11m